Currently Empty: 0,00 €

Introduction: Why EU Cybersecurity Regulation Is Now a Board-Level Topic
For CISOs and cybersecurity leaders operating in or with the EU, regulatory pressure has shifted from “nice to have” to “existential risk.” NIS2, DORA, GDPR, and the upcoming Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and EU AI Act are redefining how organizations must manage cyber risk, resilience, and supply chains.
The challenge isn’t just understanding each regulation in isolation. It’s building an integrated governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) model that:
-
Satisfies regulatory requirements
-
Supports business objectives and growth
-
Is operationally sustainable for your security team
This article provides a CISO-level roadmap with 5–7 concrete steps to navigate EU cybersecurity regulations, with a focus on NIS2 and its interplay with GDPR, DORA, CRA, and sector standards like ISO/IEC 27001.
The Regulatory Landscape: What a CISO Must Keep on the Radar
NIS2: The New Baseline for Cyber Resilience in the EU
NIS2 (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) significantly expands the scope and depth of the original NIS Directive. Key points relevant for CISOs:
-
Scope expansion: Applies to a broader set of “essential” and “important” entities, including energy, transport, health, digital infrastructure, public administration, and many digital service providers.
-
Management accountability: Executive management can be held personally liable for non-compliance and may be required to undergo cybersecurity training.
-
Stricter security measures: Risk management, incident handling, supply chain security, encryption, business continuity, and crisis management are explicitly mandated.
-
Reporting obligations: Tight timelines (early warning, incident notification, final report) for “significant incidents.”
-
Harmonized sanctions: Administrative fines and corrective measures defined at EU level; member states transpose into national law.
For a CISO, NIS2 is not “just another regulation” — it sets a minimum bar for cyber maturity across critical and important sectors in the EU.
GDPR: Data Protection and Security by Design
While GDPR is primarily a data protection regulation, it directly intersects with cybersecurity:
-
Article 32: Requires “appropriate technical and organisational measures” for security of processing.
-
Breach notification: 72-hour notification to supervisory authorities where personal data is at risk.
-
Data protection by design and by default: Security must be embedded in systems, not bolted on.
For CISOs, GDPR is effectively a risk management standard for personal data, overlapping with NIS2 in areas like incident response and security controls.
DORA: Financial Sector Resilience
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) targets financial entities (banks, investment firms, payment institutions, crypto-asset service providers etc.) and their ICT third-party providers. It focuses on:
-
Governance and ICT risk management
-
Incident classification and reporting
-
Digital operational resilience testing
-
Third-party risk and “critical” ICT providers
If your organization is in financial services, DORA creates sector-specific expectations that sit on top of NIS2 and GDPR.
Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and the EU AI Act: Product and AI Governance
Two more initiatives that CISOs should monitor:
-
Cyber Resilience Act (CRA): Will introduce mandatory cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements, shifting some responsibility to manufacturers and developers, but also impacting how buyers assess product security.
-
EU AI Act: Introduces risk-based controls for AI systems. For CISOs, it adds AI governance to the security and risk portfolio, particularly for high-risk AI applications and critical infrastructures.
Strategic Positioning: From “Compliance Projects” to Integrated Cyber Governance
Before diving into a step-by-step roadmap, it’s crucial to frame the problem correctly.
A CISO who treats each regulation (NIS2, GDPR, DORA, etc.) as a separate compliance project will end up with:
-
Overlapping controls
-
Fragmented processes
-
Multiple audits with inconsistent evidence
A more sustainable approach is to build a unified control framework anchored in well-known standards (e.g., ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 27005, ISO 22301, ISO 27701) and map regulatory requirements to that framework.
Your objective: “One security program, many compliance outputs.”
A CISO’s 7-Step Roadmap to Navigating EU Cybersecurity Regulations
Step 1: Map Your Regulatory Exposure and Criticality
Start with a regulatory impact assessment at the enterprise level.
Key Actions
-
Identify all jurisdictions and entities operating in the EU (subsidiaries, branches, critical suppliers).
-
Determine whether you qualify as:
-
Essential or important entity under NIS2
-
Financial entity under DORA
-
Data controller/processor under GDPR
-
Manufacturer/importer/distributor of “products with digital elements” affected by CRA.
-
-
Map business services to regulatory requirements:
-
Critical services
-
Supporting assets (applications, infrastructure, data, suppliers)
-
Customers and partners affected
-
Deliverables
-
Regulatory applicability matrix (NIS2, GDPR, DORA, etc.)
-
List of in-scope entities and critical services
-
Executive briefing for the board and management
Step 2: Build an Integrated Cyber Governance Framework
Once you know what applies, design governance so that one framework supports multiple regulations.
Key Actions
-
Align cybersecurity governance with enterprise risk management (ERM).
-
Define or update:
-
Cybersecurity policy framework (core policies, standards, guidelines)
-
Roles and responsibilities (CISO, DPO, CIO, business owners, risk, internal audit)
-
Reporting lines to the board or risk committee
-
-
Select a reference standard (e.g., ISO/IEC 27001) as the backbone for:
-
Risk management
-
Controls
-
Documentation
-
Continuous improvement
-
NIS2 Considerations
-
Ensure management body accountability is explicit:
-
Cybersecurity responsibilities in board charters
-
Regular briefings on risk posture and regulatory status
-
Training program for executives on NIS2 and cyber risk
-
Step 3: Perform a Holistic Cyber Risk & Gap Assessment (NIS2-Centric)
Use NIS2 as the primary lens for a comprehensive risk and gap assessment, while explicitly mapping requirements to other regulations.
Key Actions
-
Conduct a risk assessment aligned with ISO 27005 or similar:
-
Identify threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts on critical services
-
Evaluate likelihood and business impact
-
-
Perform a NIS2 readiness assessment:
-
Governance and risk management
-
Incident handling (processes, playbooks, tooling)
-
Business continuity and disaster recovery
-
Supply chain and third-party risk
-
Use of cryptography and secure development practices
-
-
Map gaps to GDPR, DORA, CRA:
-
Where controls overlap, document them once
-
Note any regulation-specific extras (e.g., DORA testing requirements)
-
Deliverables
-
Gap analysis report with clearly prioritized remediation actions
-
Risk register with owners, treatment plans, and target dates
-
High-level NIS2 maturity heatmap for leadership
Step 4: Design a Unified Control & Architecture Blueprint
The outcome of the assessment should inform a target-state architecture and control set that supports all major regulations.
Key Actions
-
Define a Target Operating Model (TOM) for cybersecurity:
-
People (SOC, incident response, risk, architecture, GRC)
-
Processes (ITIL/DevSecOps, IR, change management)
-
Technology (SIEM/XDR, IAM/PAM, EDR, encryption, backup, DR, logging)
-
-
Build a control catalog with mappings to:
-
NIS2 security requirements
-
GDPR Article 32
-
DORA’s ICT risk management requirements (if applicable)
-
CRA product security obligations (for product teams)
-
-
Ensure the architecture addresses:
-
Zero Trust principles where feasible
-
Resilience and redundancy for critical services
-
Monitoring and observability for early detection and reporting
-
Secure software development and SBOM practices
-
Deliverables
-
Target-state security architecture diagram
-
Control mapping matrix (controls → NIS2, GDPR, DORA, CRA, ISO 27001)
-
Roadmap describing “quick wins” vs strategic investments
Step 5: Strengthen Incident Response, Reporting & Business Continuity
NIS2 and DORA are explicit about incident reporting and operational resilience. This must be a core pillar of your roadmap.
Key Actions
-
Update or create:
-
Incident Response Plan (IRP) with NIS2 and GDPR scenarios
-
Communication playbooks (regulators, customers, media, internal stakeholders)
-
Breach notification workflows (for data breaches and service outages)
-
-
Align with NIS2 reporting expectations, typically including:
-
Early warning
-
Incident notification
-
Final incident report
-
-
Integrate business continuity (BCM) and disaster recovery (DR):
-
Map BC plans to critical services and NIS2/DORA expectations
-
Test recovery scenarios (ransomware, cloud outage, third-party failure)
-
-
Train and exercise:
-
Tabletop exercises with management and key functions
-
Red team/blue team simulations where feasible
-
Deliverables
-
Updated IRP, BCM & DR documentation
-
Test results and lessons learned from exercises
-
Evidence for regulators and auditors that you test and improve regularly
Step 6: Embed Third-Party & Supply Chain Security
NIS2 and DORA both emphasize supply chain and third-party risk, which is often where real-world incidents originate.
Key Actions
-
Create or refine a Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) framework:
-
Classification of suppliers based on criticality and data exposure
-
Security requirements and clauses in contracts (SLAs, right-to-audit, incident notification)
-
Onboarding due diligence (questionnaires, certifications, penetration tests, audits)
-
-
Monitor key suppliers on an ongoing basis:
-
Security posture (certifications, SOC reports, penetration testing)
-
Incident reporting and remediation
-
Concentration risk (over-dependence on one vendor or region)
-
-
Coordinate with Procurement and Legal:
-
Standardize security clauses aligned with NIS2 and DORA
-
Ensure that product teams are considering CRA and secure-by-design expectations for vendors and internal development
-
Deliverables
-
TPRM policy and process
-
Centralized vendor risk register
-
Standard security clauses and DPAs for procurement
Step 7: Operationalize Compliance: Evidence, Metrics & Continuous Improvement
Regulatory compliance is not a one-off project; it’s a continuous capability.
Key Actions
-
Build a compliance evidence model:
-
Define what evidence is needed to demonstrate adherence to NIS2, GDPR, DORA, etc.
-
Implement document management and GRC tooling to link controls, risks, incidents, and evidence.
-
-
Define KPIs and KRIs aligned with both security and regulatory goals, such as:
-
Mean Time to Detect/Respond (MTTD/MTTR)
-
Percentage of critical assets with up-to-date patches
-
Number of critical vendors with completed security assessments
-
Number of training sessions for management and staff
-
-
Establish a governance cycle:
-
Regular security and compliance steering committees
-
Quarterly or semi-annual internal audits
-
Periodic board reporting on cyber and regulatory posture
-
-
Feed learnings back into the security strategy and investment roadmap.
Deliverables
-
Regulatory compliance dashboard for leadership
-
Defined set of security & compliance KPIs/KRIs
-
Annual management review aligned with ISO 27001-style continuous improvement
Conclusion: Turning Regulatory Pressure into Strategic Advantage
EU cybersecurity regulations — from NIS2 and GDPR to DORA, CRA, and the EU AI Act — are not going away. In fact, they are converging towards a single expectation: demonstrable, risk-based cyber resilience.
For CISOs, the opportunity lies in using these regulations as a lever to:
-
Secure executive buy-in
-
Justify strategic investments
-
Mature governance, risk, and compliance processes
-
Strengthen customer and regulator trust
By following a structured roadmap — mapping exposure, building integrated governance, assessing gaps, designing the right architecture, strengthening incident response, managing third-party risk, and operationalizing compliance — you turn regulatory complexity into a clear, actionable strategy.



